The desktop is dead (really, for real this time)

Time and time again noise builds around the (re)introduction of thin client computing, the death of the desktop OS and the emergence of a single, large networked computer that we all work on.  A super mainframe that is omnipresent across all devices and networks.

But it has not been since the days of the drab green screens of the main frames that we have seen a significant uptake in thin clients over heavy metal. This is now ripe for change.

The stars are aligning in the cloud computing movement, and this time, it won't be another 3com web computing device. The traditional precursors to the explosion of the web device market have been torn down - bandwidth is ubiquitous, price of technology has come down so dramatically that these devices are now comparatively cheap against their full-blown competitors, and most computing services that people have come to expect have an online incarnation.

But the most important change is cultural.  People are demanding cheap alternatives to desktops.  The tell tale signs are there - the netbook craze, the rich web phone interfaces (iPhone, Android), and even the Kindle are all thin clients that are heavily in demand. People have begun to see the value add for a consumer of not having to maintain a desktop OS - they expect it to work like their TV - managed centrally, and pushed down. Zero maintainence time. With a wide range of people now spending most of their computing time in web browsers, and the need for desktop apps marginalized, the consumer demand has shifted towards less expensive, internet-oriented devices.

Even with the netbook fire sale, the market for these devices still hasn't been properly defined. Current netbooks are essentially small laptops with desktop OSes. While these machines hit the price point consumers expect in thin-clients, some of the real value adds a thin client can provide to consumers have not been realized in netbooks. The OS running on these devices is unnecessarially large, boot times are slow, and features like cloud storage are still not out of the box.  Couple this with the poor form factors and tiny keyboards, and there is still a lot to be done in this market.  Consumers know they don't need full blown desktop machines, but so far have only been exposed to "small laptops".

Despite the demand for netbooks, consumers still don't know what these web devices are - there is still an opportunity for proper market definition. There are very few companies who can really make the idea of web devices sit with consumers; excellent marketing coupled with good software and hardware is critical to open the market up.  With so many people having lost their shirts in the web device game over the past decade, chances are slim this company will emerge as a startup. Apple is clearly an industry favorite for defining new markets like this.  With the marketing engine to hit the concept home with consumers and the technical understanding to make it happen, and recent rumors of a "big iPhone" or "Apple Tablet", it's beginning to look like the market definition will start there.  But there are other players who look like they will be emerging as players.  TechCrunch has the "Crunch Tablet", Kindle is looking more and more like a web device daily, and Nokia has expressed serious interest in expanding into net books.

While heavy metal desktops will never become fully eclipsed by web devices, the desktop OS market looks to be in terminal decline.

Update: ... Or maybe Google will be the one to define the market.

Published Thursday, May 07, 2009 7:48 AM by mrdecav
Filed under: ,

Comments

# re: The desktop is dead (really, for real this time)

Friday, May 08, 2009 1:48 AM by Andre

This summary of variable connected computing was already written by Turning, von Neunnman or Babbadge I'm sure. This "cloud computing" label is insulting to early generation computer scientist. Even the antiquated X-Windows system  could of implemented this "business" idea. Please write about quantum computing or annealing or something somewhat original and innovating and not "catch phrase" driven...

A PARC Place Alumni.

# re: The desktop is dead (really, for real this time)

Friday, May 08, 2009 1:24 PM by cartman

How do you define a desktop?

a)Is it the visual metaphor?

b)A computing device with installed applications?

c)Something that sits on your desk?

# re: The desktop is dead (really, for real this time)

Saturday, May 09, 2009 8:50 PM by mrdecav

@cartman

There is certainly a cloudy definition (no pun intended)...  I think a desktop OS is mostly defined as an OS which is very feature rich and is designed to hold applications, state and processing locally.

This would differ from a cloud computing device because cloud computing is meant to only cache data locally, and while we've seen a movement towards native apps (App Store), they usually offload heavy processing and data to servers.

The last big thing cloud machines have going for them is a decent level of sandboxing of apps and the ability to easily "start over" if the machine gets busted without the pain of a backup/reinstall/restore.

# re: The desktop is dead (really, for real this time)

Monday, May 11, 2009 3:05 PM by cartman

Code can run locally or remotely, data can be stored locally or remotely. We've been doing this for years.

The "desktop" computer is just a larger computing device, nothing more.

The future you describe is just the past wrapped up in some new words.

# re: The desktop is dead (really, for real this time)

Tuesday, May 12, 2009 7:49 PM by mrdecav

@cartman

True, but there is a trend towards smaller computing devices, a new and streamlined distribution model, and away from the "I must have Windows because thats where my programs run" mentality.  That last one is big, because it has the potential to shift the balance of power in the technology industry from Microsoft to people like Nokia, Google, Apple, etc.

To us it may be the same, but to the consumer, we're offering a new product.

# re: The desktop is dead (really, for real this time)

Tuesday, September 08, 2009 3:34 AM by Olivier

Desktop will never be dead (never = very long time), just because the Internet is far from being everywhere with a suitable passband, so any computer will always need to be able to run softwares on its own with no outside help from the cloud.

For example, in France, if the official definition of "fast Internet" will be changed from 512 Kb to 2Mo, 60% of the country will have to be said uncovered by high speed Internet... And 2 Mo is a very low speed for an application dealing with videos, sounds or any big files. So, desktop will perhaps be dead one day, but I thing we will all here be dead before...

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems